Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
This article displays in one automatically-generated column. View the full page to see article in its original form.

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE’S COURT.

* ASHBURTON. —To-Day. (Before Mr J. N. Wood. R.M.) CIVIL CASKS. Clarke v. Firth. Claim LI 6s Id. Order for amount with costs. Martin v. Meharry. Mr Branson, for the plaintiff, said that the matter had been settled out of Court without his bein<j consulted. He applied for the case to b e heard. Solicitors had a right to be protected by the Court. The Magistrate saiil ho had no power to hear the case in th e absence of both plaintiff and defendant. Cas.e struck out.

Dunstan v. Muir. No appearance. Case struck out.

Spence v. Brydone. No appearance, Case struck out.

Jones v. Kelly. Claim for rent, L 9 10s. Mr O’Reilly for defendant. A witness named Samuel Guinney was called, but did not appear. Mr O’Reilly produced receipts paid subsequently to the last date mentioned in the claim. The claim for the first part of the rent was on Guinney, who took the place, not on Kelly. The Police Magistrate said that the plaintiff should not have let Guinney leave the house without making him pay. Guinney was apparently the right man to sue. Plaintiff was nonsuited, with LI Is costs. Reid and Gray v. Harvey. Claim, LI 7 13s on a promissory note. Mr Crisp foi ■ defendant. The manager for Reid and; Gray deposed as to the claim. By Mr Crisp: George Harvey’s signature is that, attached to the promissory note. I die I not see him write it. I senfhim notice of dishonor as soon as I got i c from Dunedin.. He gave the promissory note to me. Ik was for a plough. There was no promise to renew the note if required. Mr Crisp said that as the defendant had not thought fit to appear, and had tried to settle the matter behind his back, he could not say anything more. Order for amount, with costs 19s.

Spence v. Brydone. Claim for LI 16s. Order for amount, with LI 10s costs. Orr and Co. v. Pearce. Claim for LIOO. Mr Crisp, fir defendant, contended that under the 20th clause of the Act, the summons was not served within sufficient time. The Bencli concurred. Plaintiff was nonsuited without costs. The Court then adjourned.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

http://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AG18810722.2.10

Bibliographic details

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE’S COURT., Ashburton Guardian, Volume 2, Issue 402, 22 July 1881

Word Count
371

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE’S COURT. Ashburton Guardian, Volume 2, Issue 402, 22 July 1881

  1. New formats

    Papers Past now contains more than just newspapers. Use these links to navigate to other kinds of materials.

  2. Hierarchy

    These links will always show you how deep you are in the collection. Click them to get a broader view of the items you're currently viewing.

  3. Search

    Enter names, places, or other keywords that you're curious about here. We'll look for them in the fulltext of millions of articles.

  4. Search

    Browsed to an interesting page? Click here to search within the item you're currently viewing, or start a new search.

  5. Search facets

    Use these buttons to limit your searches to particular dates, titles, and more.

  6. View selection

    Switch between images of the original document and text transcriptions and outlines you can cut and paste.

  7. Tools

    Print, save, zoom in and more.

  8. Explore

    If you'd rather just browse through documents, click here to find titles and issues from particular dates and geographic regions.

  9. Need more help?

    The "Help" link will show you different tips for each page on the site, so click here often as you explore the site.

Working