Hi folks. Complete the Papers Past survey to let us know what you’d like added over the next few years. ×
Article image
Article image
This article displays in one automatically-generated column. View the full page to see article in its original form.


Tho Lyttelton Harbor Board have finally considered the resolutions of the Ashburton County Council and have entered up judgment. That judgment is just as we expected it would be—viz., against any admission of the Ashburton County’s claims to direct representation at the Board. It is satisfactory to note, however, that tho members of the Board are remarkably well pleased with themselves, that they believe they have discharged their duties as no other public body in the Southern hemisphere has discharged its duties, and having done so feel themselves equal to the task of spending all the loan recently secured without any help from outside, and without sharing the honor of doing so with new blood. From the report of the meeting as published in the Christchurch papers, we learn that some members were quite prepared to admit The county of Ashburton to representation at the Board, provided other counties were represented, but perhaps the most sensible suggestion made was that the system of nomination by which members are appointed should cease, and that the Board should be an elective one, with every interest represented. There is altogether too much nomineeism in the public bodies of this colony, and the sooner the broad principle of representation is recognised and acted upon the better. The chief opponents of any change in the constitution of the Harbor Board were tho Chairman (Hon. E. Richardson) and Mr. Murray-Aynesley, the former believing that the construction of the Board being tlie outcome of tho collective wisdom of both houses of Parliament, and he would therefore use his utmost endeavor to oppose any alteration. Mr. Turner, in advocating direct representation, told the Board that as it at present stood it was not alivo to its own interests, inasmuch as it had refused to reduce the wharf charges and expenses while at the same time it claimed to have nominally some thousands of surplus income. We should say the counties who use the Port of Lyttelton as the outlet for their grain have a good case to go to Parliament with for a reconstruction of the Harbor Board on a representation basis.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item


Bibliographic details

THE COUNCIL AND THE HARBOR BOARD., Ashburton Guardian, Volume 1, Issue 71, 9 March 1880

Word Count

THE COUNCIL AND THE HARBOR BOARD. Ashburton Guardian, Volume 1, Issue 71, 9 March 1880

  1. New formats

    Papers Past now contains more than just newspapers. Use these links to navigate to other kinds of materials.

  2. Hierarchy

    These links will always show you how deep you are in the collection. Click them to get a broader view of the items you're currently viewing.

  3. Search

    Enter names, places, or other keywords that you're curious about here. We'll look for them in the fulltext of millions of articles.

  4. Search

    Browsed to an interesting page? Click here to search within the item you're currently viewing, or start a new search.

  5. Search facets

    Use these buttons to limit your searches to particular dates, titles, and more.

  6. View selection

    Switch between images of the original document and text transcriptions and outlines you can cut and paste.

  7. Tools

    Print, save, zoom in and more.

  8. Explore

    If you'd rather just browse through documents, click here to find titles and issues from particular dates and geographic regions.

  9. Need more help?

    The "Help" link will show you different tips for each page on the site, so click here often as you explore the site.