Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

MACKENZIE COUNTY DOG REGISTRATION.

TO THB EDITOR OB THB TEMiBTJ HERALD. Sib,~ l see that Mr Hurehant, m reply to your remarks on this subject, denies ray statement thnt there were no registration offices within this oounty, and supports his argument by simply saying that the Council's office at Burke'a Pae» is a registration office. Now, Sir, your careful explanation of tho Act showed that the local authority should appoint registration offices. In the absence of an advertisement that this appointment has beon made — with the Council's advertisement m view, that, a tax should be collected by a travelling collector — I can safely say there has been no such appointment made. Now, Bir, with these faots before me, I oanßOt tee how Mr Marohant | can make this statement unless he considers himself the local authority end has just made the appointment ; or that tho office! come m for the business by succession or m eomo other way that is altogether unknown to the Act. Under any of theoe oironmstances, I am afraid it will be hard to see how Burke'a Psas gets the favor alone. I am m a quandary still. I should like to be safe from a fine, and await the travelling collector, as the eight of him might give one an idea how to get a billet as collector on commission, without publio applications being called for. By finding space for: the above you would oblige, I am, (to., Batefatxb.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/THD18840131.2.21.2

Bibliographic details

Timaru Herald, Volume XL, Issue 2919, 31 January 1884, Page 3

Word Count
243

MACKENZIE COUNTY DOG REGISTRATION. Timaru Herald, Volume XL, Issue 2919, 31 January 1884, Page 3

MACKENZIE COUNTY DOG REGISTRATION. Timaru Herald, Volume XL, Issue 2919, 31 January 1884, Page 3