AUSTRALIAN SCADALS.
-The> Melbourne a. con?IA
temporary writes:—Thej■ pcandal-loving tasjtes.pf a large parfc,. pf the. p.ubliq harp 5 been disappointed by r ; fhe /docUiqa oft the ji JadgO;of theiDivprce ipourtijwho; hajj,/ be'en for.sorae days petiWi.for. divorce, to hear the case ;■. Ooa-j!•: sequently, the-long reports, whiph would Hi have furnished 1 highly prurient reading to interested : readers, have not appeared in the papers. The ground of aotion alleged '' by the. wife, who is the petitioner, is that''! the, marriage was hot; and'could not be, ■', consilium itod .She", had been .".; living ',{ separate from her husband for many,-j years* and received a handsome mainten«,lji ance from him, but nowr-somowhatjlato. > in. the day—she seeks a decree declaring;. the marriage a nullity; -'The case is not H yet completed; but'it-is understood that -< the husband strenuously denies in his evi« ' dence the incapacity attributed to him, -j and "that the 1 medical evidence is equally';"' decided between the twb'partiesi But if u our scandal-mongers have been in'this ' unjustlydefraudedout of their rights,a t i recent ,oase ir^, New South, '• Wales - has s given themplenly of congenial'matterfor discussion.:'; An aotion was brought; by a.?-: gentleman and lady of West'Maitlahdf against.,the Bishop of Newcastle for an'* L t impudent slander.of whioh that" reyorond I . L father " is found by • the verdict of the.,.',, jury to be guilty. The Bishop, had heard*. ? some tales from some tattling churchwardens, which, to his pure mind, conclusively: proved the existence of improper relations between the Incumbent of West-. Maitland and a lady of his flook-a married' lady, wife of a gentleman of \ seholarship : and character,.and,herself;> highly educated and ; of., irreproabtiabio " reputation/ • '"Before examining the' 1 Evidence the Bishop called-upon the clergy-.: man ...to, resign.,.; The clergyman/ xMx Thackery, declined-to,allow, slanderous' iale-bearers to destroy his character in this way, and refused'to'confess crime by resigninghisposition,: Theupshot-ofall was that his "spiritual lordship "was" taken into Court to justify : the imputations he • had cast on.the, good name-of .several, pe'rsons' upon grounds' that" it would'bo folly to speak of as evidence. In extenuation he had .-nothing..to-bring-,'for ward;; save; the; stories of-.the churchprdehs,l one of whom said that it'was^.the'most: j important ; part : of his office ; to appoint l himself a detective-spy upon' the actions' of his-clergyman.- 1 He. was. 1 seen'by the lady prowling about the house one night, and she applied, to hica the forcible, but under the circumstances, just appellation ofa <! sneak." ; The injured churchwarden,, ' explained-'that he was not'"sneaking ' around," but was. merely " walking up, and:down to watch whether the rumour:' was true.";.', And for listening with an woman's, "greedy, credulity to; all,'the '. tattle, and. for, upon the'.strength of it,... slandering the, honour, of .'a virtuous lady, | this bishop was 'treated by the jury with the absurd leniency implied in damages to the amount 0f.4(35. In,addition,. h.e/:{ obtained the contempt of. all honestmen; "± but this is a small matter., ' : .■.*(■;,..' ■}[
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/THA18740612.2.12
Bibliographic details
Thames Advertiser, Volume VII, Issue 1838, 12 June 1874, Page 3
Word Count
472AUSTRALIAN SCADALS. Thames Advertiser, Volume VII, Issue 1838, 12 June 1874, Page 3
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.