Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

R. M. COURT, MERCER.-FRIDAY.

rilcfcrn K. C. Itirotow. Ksi|., U.M., and Thomas Jackson, K«| , .1.1'.] Xi\\iEi:oi\s eases of drunkenness were disposed of ill vai ions wajs. Amongst others, our native friends mustered as usual, and were mulcted, departing with their accustomed grunts of disapproval. An assault case — l!eed, of Paparata (who employed Mr. Laishlcy as solicitor), rerxm Moran, of the same place (defended by Mr. ThorrJb),—occupied the time and patience of the Court for a protracted period, and finally terminated iu defendant bcir.g fined i' 3. A civil case—Thomas Wells v. Samuel S. Rogers, for goods supplied to the amount of 1-10 :5s 3d, — came before the Court. Defendant confessed judgment, and entered into an arrangement with Mr. Wells, which left the intervention of the Court uncalled for. Costs, 13s. This concluded the business.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZH18750520.2.38

Bibliographic details

New Zealand Herald, Volume XII, Issue 4217, 20 May 1875, Page 2 (Supplement)

Word Count
134

R. M. COURT, MERCER.-FRIDAY. New Zealand Herald, Volume XII, Issue 4217, 20 May 1875, Page 2 (Supplement)

R. M. COURT, MERCER.-FRIDAY. New Zealand Herald, Volume XII, Issue 4217, 20 May 1875, Page 2 (Supplement)