SUPREME COURT

Evening Post, Volume CVII, Issue 102, 4 May 1929, Page 15

SUPREME COURT

CIVIL CASES The following Civil cases have been set down for hearing at the quarterly sessions ot the Supreme Court, which' open on luesday next:— | Before a Judge and Jury of Twelve. Lan Meiklejohu Jlatheson v. Henry fcchueideman, £500 dauiuses for alleaecl slander. Before a Judge Alone. Lillian Marguerite Henderson v. C'viil bicine.v Brice, decree, etc. Lottie Jsobel Harris, as executrix of the will of Charlotte Harris, v. lobacconists, Ltd., specific performance. Cuuntei'claim, declaration. Janet "Winifred Taylor v. Lily Lawrence I and others, declaration, etc. Cordelia ilaud Forbes v. George Forbes, £600 allegedly due under agreement. lloore Wilson and Co., Ltd. v. O. M. Smith and Co., Ltd., £431 for alleged breach of contract. Frederick Henry Eennie v. Margaret Diamond, £745, allegedly due under agreement. Counter-claim, accounts, etc. Official Assignee in Bankruptcy of the property of Albert William Foote v. Eva Maud Foote, declaration, etc. Harriet Annie Morris v. Mary Elizabeth Kainey, declaration, etc. Lizzie Edith Mathers v. Hugh lluir, £1250 damages for injuries allegedly received. Self Help Co-Op. Grocery, Ltd., v. James Alexander Hannah and others, £2000 damages for alleged breach of contract. Harry Edward Andrews and another v. Mark Green, specific performance. Counterclaim, declaration. Horace Charles Tonks v. William Tonks and others, accounts, etc. J. Harvey v. J. L. Bellancy, £125 for goods allegedly supplied. James Bennie v. Isabel Lyall Bellanej", £174 for professional services allegedly rendered. Stephen Crawford v. Xcw Zealand National Creditmen's Association (Wei- i lington), Ltd., £520 damages, for alleged wrongful dismissal. Catherine M'Carthy v. Charles I M'Carthy. declaration. Counter-claim, possession. Marie Isabella Rosalind Victoria Terry i

v. William Sullivan, specific performance. John Hamilton Miles and others v. Anastasia Culliuane aud another, £*)0 allegedly due in costs. William Howard Johnson v. Wellington City Council, £7SI damages for alleged netriiaence. Henry Kobert Flood v. Lower Hutt Borough Council, £353 ilaniases for alleged negligence. Walter E. Aked v. 'William J. Prousc, £475, fees allegedly due. Lan Meiklejohn Jlathcson and another v. Henry Schneideman, £1309 allegedly due under agreement. William Edward Timmings v. John Thomas Benge and others, declaration. William Ernest Cuff v. Freda Parkinson, £213 allegedly due on promissory notes. Counter-claim, accounts. Lan Meiklejohn Matheson v. Henry Schneidemau, £050 damages for alleged wrongful dismissal. Hercules Robert Hunter v. Bank of New Zealand Officers' Guarantee and Provident Association, declaration, etc. Christopher Smith v. Thomas Coltman, £007 dagames for injuries allegedly received. Evans Bay Timber Co., Ltd. v. John Levy Mac Duff and another, £210 cllegedly due on goods sold. Esther Isabella Ross v. Bell Bus Co., £536 damages for injuries allegedly received. Henry Schneideman v. Philip Schneideman, £1007 allegedly due under award. Frederick John Rayner v. H.M. the King, £35,000 allegedly due under agree-