CORPORATION EMPLOYEES.

Evening Post, Volume LXXIV, Issue 128, 26 November 1907, Page 8

CORPORATION EMPLOYEES.

'^Sm TssKt janntai jwrp»f ri£ -lie CorJmasmsz. -^ms^e^k icas idg an Sa*ur-: wsr- *: ifc BaiJK^- SecnsK&m JSctaxaids, '■ frsri- 'Skr? ncae r& *" TX, zßtaazsf ctp <5^ JEncineer and *e*t=s. ss-ssdliOTE. !£u& sporis'xesniied z . — IS&siK 'sitrf , T. Bercarf 2, S. HitiJBsL Z. lll'^sf ipns;. T. TTSBBay 1. M. 'M'zztz'sr^ 3. ISQwrfe ioM menl, P. Hop- - I- BiSEkaasop 2. Iffi>rss jEsneral -zusm X li£TS3ai!"l,3:. Kfik £ iChie SBda- ms£x 1. S^saE 1, P. Dnncan. 2. JSBkrs "spmn W B-nneK %5. r £=ra- :si2rr»e -wsansß), ifcs. IRuliaessas: 1 Jirt- Jsa-*2. S^ras -tgeneral Jtesssss: E !T'.n>sii ~L, X Ssrdor 2. IDOvds jsaas- v-saas^l X- Wlme t, B. M'Qoado L -^?_7TK tB^EL.. T. Bsazaifl 1. J. 36bn«E i. ISTrrdz: xxsssateeei. 3. Et^bs 1, * 2. IBaS-axSe, 3. Goe 1, P. **^ass: I SCjves ifestroct»r and iaasssaa«r . =E. S^iasx 1 R. Balway 2. SS^Tas- iisarjasiHs,. KSI jnpp X, J- "ingane?? 2; 2S"s7m <sssx=3agezßi, F.lSjaver « »' Lasrr 2 t^tSs jtM men, City iLsc£B»-«Er> ?j>srifi.' TS3aei, I). M&haney 1, .ie iksiirajs^ S. »mEsan|f comJiK^sst. .axri. £:a7if«rd i, Mrs. Gott 2.

Tmtpf 'Soe s la-qje H^sndaace «!* mem%es &a£. TJEzinrs -as Jasi -week's (session ac 3J«r jfrtxtc's StcDnaiion <tf Good "Saaoazjs. Bra. £ 3. ' JJEodelL, C.1., sjswstflel. Qxib si&R* xosaxhsx -was initiated, •acr *isa, astitars pnjpa^eiL The sMgplng KSBBSsciEH. itt<f dnrini: ihe lessening pro--TKxshc -c wean's- la J&ro/"W, Halcnison. £xsz£zz&; grzsT&zs were Tiedvtd from *be_ TKarsro'siicS to -cations lodges in -=ijicki£iE!, Cfcri?i^bEr*&, and InrercarSsoasnirsßiMe interest vnas iaien hi a *s*-' usard si ihe Isnser Hntt Magis- *»-«-*■ ILoari yesterday, -wrhea G, Anstis, IP' Saaraleter, JC SuUop. <3- <sibson, A. aaS T. Smith "wers charged TrSKh jsKwaitiiK: Kerning Boss, a irellisKßo: .a&caS -jesident & appeared that csacsisianiaa: -hati gone to B*eJ3evue Gar••iiea:. j& rremnve -c dog for # friend, wrbist -ise sjee met fey £be defendants, ssks£ iht: isgan. -Contradictory *T4£J?si'*» -seas givsu, and lie bench, xza&iszziz <£ _S»^srs. London, Cudby, aEccd CiaKwmat, Justices,, decided to dis- »■« lii^ iidormßrtkiu with £2 costs *jjwn?i« torsplainasL Mr. Lpwey ap■pzznrc tor ctauplEinant aad Mr.^Cra■■crsfc lor xiv: defendants. ■£<*•»*■ Visgue notions of an Arbitration tkeor. atsard in Tcference to domestic *E r '-.-«is; colaaj^.g £he «-ridence of parfes XT: jb ease before Mr Siddell. S M., itts. -Biarniag Anaie -^-ohnston sued dtear?. l«*t£g» bsr employer, for £1 15 a in hmi of a -jreek's notice. Aclang imxte? ihf -iinpressifm that ihere was an s««sEr^ «£-ei^iju; the question, the de■iasuLaxn gavr tie plamiaff wages for 48 iswars «nij instead -of flip whole week. Wsrsfitp said he hacl no knowledge c? smr &Y.szil on the point. Servants, itv&iz&fEg. S^rcomnKQ iaw, were, entitled tc a ««k"*r solace or -wages in lieu ih-rr^c. - XL? jjlainiaff had already re«Kv&c s«t <lajs* 'wages, and therefore «E3id Ktsiy claim for fire niore. As for ioar£ tjrs iodpng he coald not allow iaai u> enter into the question. JndgSBssl wroud be for the plaintiff for 12s he,, cods of court, is. As 3b sic Otago boofcsellsrs'protest atfexm*e xijt! isaTT duty on "Weldon's jfinr-iyt-^ iiie Jhmec&n Star states (says * Prsas Associsiaon ttlegram) that the ass&sKries is*rißjg eoDsidej«d the matter, - -«3i sssBXB a iwonixbfe answer. I A issMidh -ri ihn X»2L Fanners' Union is isersg fonQE^ at MaV;ara t near Wd-