RESIDENT MAGISTRATE COURT.
(Before-Tlwmas-Beckham, Esq., R.M-.) Action eoh Detenue. !M.aiv ßHA^:^ia Pl , o^Hr.i Judgment was given in this case, which iiadj been brought for "fhe~restoration of certain! Nonsuited. / *if»'"u¥t4'rolWb^s ] To' set Wiitf %rJ_WB_& ' Wilson y. Jones. —Judgment set aside.! 'Qbldon -Crowi-'Ette-riaM CriM.C.T'l'Ttegda^.! —Application refused. <_£.Bi.&un l^i'Str-yKb^t.^ETltrE-.^117 I)l'", h!° Unsatisfied judgment ot the Court, £9 13s.1 -WHS? W_>nk 1(for _ilalh_in*'M^, _foy fb^'attfeha-j ant. ! .oi b'ihiioJJu feiab-iO t.
John Moore Perrier deposed : I have.filed a declaration of insolvency in the Supreme Court and am at present under its protection, having been adjudged a bankrupt. Notice of this has been published. Case adjourned for production of notices of insolvency. Judgments fobPiaintiffs.
Macfarlane v. Wright, money lent, £5; Newman and Ewen v. Loveden. goods, £8 16s j Taylor v. Singer, board, £_ 4s 6d; Dillon; v. Mullin, for returning of a bppk, value £l|08; Porter and Co. v. Fernand*iis|.£5 12s 4d. } Burst and Co. v. Carpenter, £8 29 l*. ftp.. M-. ______ Depended Cams. W; ,'.'/,
''" New,Zealaud Gold Mmmg1 Cojhr. ; Book#, <!alls.*M^. Rees for plainW.* M^iMcOm-mick for defendant pleaded that he wasv'hot">p_hare-». hofdet, //>- sM- '•> Mj v Judgment reserved till next Court day. •- "* »oßTH'"isi.Ain> G-.ar.o. v. nathan. Aotion brought by the liquidator for re•covery of _WST m*1»ms*Mmmam" m ■—■—' T—" Mr. Hesketh for plaintiff; Mr. Wynn and Mr. MacCormick for defendant.
Defence: The company is not in liquidation. Objectidff,#«» R-'ai-ed! by'counsel-for defendant that the company had not sufficient assets to pay costs Of 'adverse judgment ■'. 4>uV such ability was proved' by-Mr. fl/Hi 1/Usk, Official Liquidator, who also testified to his having--beenjappointed liquidator ;at one extraordinary meeting pf shareholders, and confirmed by another | and that he had forwarded notice in due 'form for" publication in the Gazette.at Wellington.', .He had not yet re-ceived-a:cop_f of the Gazette/ ■:■.._. '"' The Court held that the produc|;ibn;,of the Gazette was a necessity, and gavei-M*. Hesketh a nonsuit. ' f'-
In a similar case by the same company v, Shove, in. the' absence of the same evidence (the Gazette), a nonsuit also was accepted; ' j Court adjourned for half-an-hour.,: i• I These to be placed, the first c^ses in the JR. M Court .-:•:,.•'
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AS18700610.2.13
Bibliographic details
Auckland Star, Volume I, Issue 131, 10 June 1870, Page 2
Word Count
346RESIDENT MAGISTRATE COURT. Auckland Star, Volume I, Issue 131, 10 June 1870, Page 2
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Auckland Libraries.