Article.

THE AUSTRALIAN CRICKETERS IN ENGLAND.

Waikato Times, Volume XXIII, Issue 1881, 26 July 1884, Page 3

 

THE AUSTRALIAN CRICKETERS IN ENGLAND.

Defeat of the Visitors. (BY TELEGRAPH. COPYRIGHT.] fItEDTER'S TEIiFORAMS London, July 23. The cricket match at Lords, the Australians v. England, was resumed and conclude! to day. The weather was fine, and the attendance Large. The Austialians, with 73 runs up and 4 wickets down, sent in Midwinter and Giffen. The latter was caught w lien he had made 5, and on Spoifoith joining Midwinter the latter was bowled. Boyle became Spofforth's partner, and about 20 runs were added before a sepaiation was effected, Spoffoith being caught when he had 11 to his ciedit. Palmer was the next man in, but neither he nor Boyle was able to make a btand. Boyle was bowled for 10. Scott then came to the wickets, and succeeded in in nmng up a well-played 31, when Palmer was dismissed, being bowled for 13. Blackham, the last man, was nijiued by a ball shortly after going in, and was cempelled to retire. The innings thus closed for 145, Scott carrying out his bat for 31. The All England Eleen thus won the match by an innings and 5 runs. Score

McDonncl,b- 20 Jloyle, b It Murdoch, c 17 Palmer, b 13 Uanncrman.candb 27 Scott, not out 31 Bonnor, c <md b 4 Blac.kh.un, (retired) C 3ifTcn, l 5 htrns 1 Midwinter, b (5 spofroilb.c U Total 145

Alsirlians. Second Innings.

Click here to view this newspaper article

This text was automatically generated by a computer. It has not been manually reviewed or corrected and may include errors. You can view the article in its original format or read the entire page.

About the computer-generated text

Optical Character Recognition (OCR) is a process for automatically extracting text from scanned pages. OCR enables searching of large quantities of full-text data, but it is not 100% accurate. The level of accuracy depends on the print quality of the original newspaper and its condition at the time of microfilming. Newspapers with poor quality paper, small print, mixed fonts, multiple column layouts or damaged pages may have poor OCR accuracy.

The page where this item appears has an estimated OCR accuracy of 97.72%.