Article.

PORT CHALMERS WATERSIDERS.

Maoriland Worker, Volume 7, Issue 302, 29 November 1916, Page 3

 

PORT CHALMERS WATERSIDERS.

At JasD UiUJtuig oi mo i'ort Ciiaimurs' Waterside Union, at which over J OO member were present, it was unanimously resolved: "That this union rogrots that tlio agitation which is directed against tho lion. J. T. Paul is not being directed against the toad cxpioiteis, uiio aiu piling up prolits by exploicnig ilip of those in the trenches; and this union further regrets that the smallest union, and one with the lowest

rate of wages, presumes to speak on behalf of organised labor." The Otago "Daily Times," which printed Mr. Boreham's scurrilous attack on Mr. Paul under attractive headlines, gave the foregoing resolution an obscure position and with no headline whatever. SEAMEN'S UNION. At Port Chalmers diinctilty in obtaining dock and stokehold crews for two transports ivas experienced last week. The men, before they would agree to shjn on, wanted a 20 per , cent, bonus, a week's holiday, a free railway pass to their homes on arrival in England, and the payment of onehalf c.f their wages when they reached England. Tho men wci'; advised by tho Union Executive ia to sign nn under ordinary cotnliiioir, with the exception of half-payment of wages, as a refusal to do so was a breach of agreement with the Defence Department. The trouble was settled on this basis.

Click here to view this newspaper article

This text was automatically generated by a computer. It has not been manually reviewed or corrected and may include errors. You can view the article in its original format or read the entire page.

About the computer-generated text

Optical Character Recognition (OCR) is a process for automatically extracting text from scanned pages. OCR enables searching of large quantities of full-text data, but it is not 100% accurate. The level of accuracy depends on the print quality of the original newspaper and its condition at the time of microfilming. Newspapers with poor quality paper, small print, mixed fonts, multiple column layouts or damaged pages may have poor OCR accuracy.

The page where this item appears has an estimated OCR accuracy of 97.74%.