Article.

Freehold v. Leasehold.

Manawatu Times, Volume XXVI, Issue 7164, 15 February 1901, Page 3

 

Freehold v. Leasehold.

(To tlio Editor.)

g IR) The Land Administration of the present Government, with allits defects, has been productive of sound results in the form of bona fide settlement ; but, alas 1 apparent prosperity is responsible ior the introduction of that dangerous theory, namely, a change of tenure from leasehold to freehold. Past experience haa shown us that the majority of the small struggling. settlers must be protected by the State against their own weaknesses, as there exists a class of 'men'to whose interests it is of as inuch importance to persuade tho small settler ■ j to" go plunging as it was the late Disrae?: * Government to persuade the young Khedive of Egypt to live a reckless life, add consequently sacrifice his f our m^lion pounds' worth of scrip in the Suez Canal. Land settlement has reJreved the congested state of the labour market; it has given the settler a social jstand'ng ; it has added to the quantity of m-oduce for export from the colony. $0W we need to protect and safeguard fcuxselves from the greatest of dangers, the moneylender. As regards Crown tenantry, with the leasehold tenure we are safe. With a conversion to freehold a mighty temptation is placed before us, VYJth thß claßß before mentioned always D w pur trail.—l am, etc., • Settler.

February 12,1901.

Click here to view this newspaper article

This text was automatically generated by a computer. It has not been manually reviewed or corrected and may include errors. You can view the article in its original format or read the entire page.

About the computer-generated text

Optical Character Recognition (OCR) is a process for automatically extracting text from scanned pages. OCR enables searching of large quantities of full-text data, but it is not 100% accurate. The level of accuracy depends on the print quality of the original newspaper and its condition at the time of microfilming. Newspapers with poor quality paper, small print, mixed fonts, multiple column layouts or damaged pages may have poor OCR accuracy.

The page where this item appears has an estimated OCR accuracy of 97.79%.