Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SALE OF UQUOR

WITHOUT LICENCE

MAN AND WIFE GUILTY

Evidence of purchases of liquor by a constable in plain clothes was given in the Magistrate's Court today when a seaman, John Frederick Harmer, and his wife, Ivy Ellen Harmer, appeared before Mr. W. F. Stilwell, S.M., and were convicted of; selling liquor without a licence. William John Sturrock, ship's cook, and Marjory Tebbett, machinist, were found guilty of being on the premises. Sentence in all cases will be imposed on Monday. Sub-Inspector D. J. M, Hewitt, who prosecuted,. said . that on .February 5 Constable Stewart visited the Harmers' premises in, Ghuznee Street and purchased liquor from Harmer. He went away again, and'later in the evening, in company with a sailor, he returned, and, the sailor purchased a further four bottles of peer from Harmer, On February 20 Constable Stewart once more Visited the place, and purchased liquor from Mrs. Harmer.- • "There were men there mofs or less under the influence of UquSr," said the sub-inspector. "The place has been frequented by seamen and a sprinkling of womenfolk—l suppose to give a little tone to the place." . Constable Stewart, after giving evidence along the lines-indicated by the sub-inspector,-said, in answer to a question by counsel (Mr. G, I. Joseph), that he had been- wearing a merchant seaman's badge. • I , "Were yo,u entitled to wear it?" asked Mr. Joseph, , to which witness :said that he-was acting under instructions. ■ . ■•: .-•"■■ : Do you know why you were told to wear^a.. merchant- seaman's badge?—l iwas acting under instructions;' " .'"Yours but to do or die' kind of idea," commented counsel. ■ THE DEFENCE. .. ' ' Outlining\%s defenpe, Mr. Joseph said that ,on-, February 5, when the constable was, alleged- to have purchased beer from Harmer, that defendant had gone to a cabaret and remained there to the,last dance. On the other occasion Stewart came to Mrs. Harmer and introduced -himself as Willis, a seaman off a, well-known, ship, saying that he was a personal friend of her husband. He said he was just off the ship, was- very thirsty, and would she j give him a drink. Mrs.. Harmer gave | • the constable and ■ his friend a bottle I of beer, but did notsell-it t- them or to anyone else. . Harmer denied vehemently that Uquor had. ever been sold in his home. Merchant seamen, especially these days, said counsel, were a ' great brotherhood. • Sometimes as many as six seamen were living in the Harmers' home, and never less than three. Very often ships docked after 6 o'clock, and it was not possible for the seamen to get liquor without breaking the law. The defendants' house had become a kind of social club for seamen.. Beer was consumed there, but not sold, Evidence along these lines was given by .the defendants. . The Magistrate said there was no doubt in his mind that the constable's evidence should be accepted.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19420306.2.109

Bibliographic details

Evening Post, Volume CXXXIII, Issue 55, 6 March 1942, Page 9

Word Count
476

SALE OF UQUOR Evening Post, Volume CXXXIII, Issue 55, 6 March 1942, Page 9

SALE OF UQUOR Evening Post, Volume CXXXIII, Issue 55, 6 March 1942, Page 9